"Knot Dirty"... LOVE IT!
I sell invisible wax and invisible tools to help you dread. They're free, there's no shipping charges, and no package will come to your door.
--
My new book Ban The Taboo Vol 1
updated by @soaring-eagle: 07/09/15 10:44:13PM
"Knot Dirty"... LOVE IT!
I sell invisible wax and invisible tools to help you dread. They're free, there's no shipping charges, and no package will come to your door.
Since the main ingredient in DreadheadHQ dread wax is beeswax and since microcrystalline wax is also an ingredient, and the melting point of beeswax starts at about 140F: Assuming the dread wax is used as recommended, how can it be claimed that your wax can be removed using hot water or a hair dryer?This website claims "All sides agreed" As it may come as no surprise the given answer has nothing to do with the question.
This is precisely why I'd like to see a second shot taken at this "debate"; a lot more will be accomplished if your points are presented directly to Johnny, rather than indirectly through this thread. Talking behind each others' backs will not accomplish anything constructive. I think both KJC and the collective group of people posting in this thread should have some kind of open communication to lay a better foundation upon which to start the debate again, but this time, make sure all misunderstandings are completely out of the way.
This communication would have to be held on a site outside of this one, perhaps one like Skype and have the video communication recorded for all to see. Wherever the site, it couldn't be on any "home turf" because that leaves a window open to attacks. If you guys really want to this to come to a full, conclusive agreement on behalf on both sides, something has to be agreed upon with mutual understanding from both sides.
We would need a clear, undeniable agreement in the form of writing from both Johnny and SE/KS on a third-party site. The reason why I suggest a third-party site is because there can be no argument over which site in which the debate will be held, and then both sides can come back to their "home turf" and post/discuss the progress amongst their peers.
I do agree it would have to be held on a forum to allow time between responses, but this time coming to a written agreement from both you and Jonny on exactly what time and day the debate starts, and give a time frame each day in which the debate will be held. Adding the time frame will allow there to be a "live" debate, while allowing time before/after each day to allow everyone to regroup their thoughts and allow time for experiments to be held. This will also allow debates to be held in real-time between both sides while avoiding either side to continue the debate with the other absent. Setting a schedule of something like Mondays through Fridays from the hours of 4 to 6 pm EST would accomplish this task. Of course, there would have to be agreed upon days and hours in which each side will meet up on the forum for the debate. There will also have to be moderation done to keep things under control and keep people from posting outside of the agreed upon time frames.
How would you feel about this kind of idea?
soaringeagle said:hows that a debate? a debate must have all the discussion in 1 place not questions here answers there like hes trying thats just putting on a show
its fine if the debates on a sepewrate site but the site must be a forum only a forum would allow both questions answers and discussion of both questions and answers
i went way out of my way to make this a safe haven leaving the questions availible fopr 2 weeks prior..with the thread closed to make sire there were no arguments no rock throwing just the questions
we edited the questions to eliminate any insulting language we refined them to be fair as can be and to ensure he could answer them withoyt too much compromisie to his business
we e,liminated questions based on the fact sa truthfull answer would make future wax sales impossible ot liable
knotty was very much a force in refining qquestions to the point hed be able to answer without inciminating himself too much
and makig them precise.
we basicly caught him in a lie just now and he tried to turn it against us..
so basicly all he was able to do was answer 1 question with an answer that doesnt even answer the question...
hes got alot of faith in his products i see
SikTh_Man said:This is precisely why I'd like to see a second shot taken at this "debate"; a lot more will be accomplished if your points are presented directly to Johnny, rather than indirectly through this thread. Talking behind each others' backs will not accomplish anything constructive. I think both KJC and the collective group of people posting in this thread should have some kind of open communication to lay a better foundation upon which to start the debate again, but this time, make sure all misunderstandings are completely out of the way.
This communication would have to be held on a site outside of this one, perhaps one like Skype and have the video communication recorded for all to see. Wherever the site, it couldn't be on any "home turf" because that leaves a window open to attacks. If you guys really want to this to come to a full, conclusive agreement on behalf on both sides, something has to be agreed upon with mutual understanding from both sides.
We would need a clear, undeniable agreement in the form of writing from both Johnny and SE/KS on a third-party site. The reason why I suggest a third-party site is because there can be no argument over which site in which the debate will be held, and then both sides can come back to their "home turf" and post/discuss the progress amongst their peers.